Monday, July 15, 2013

Krugman: Hunger Games

The good doctor gets shrill about the way the Republicans are caring for the poor and the hungry.

…House Republicans voted to maintain farm subsidies — at a higher level than either the Senate or the White House proposed — while completely eliminating food stamps from the bill.

To fully appreciate what just went down, listen to the rhetoric conservatives often use to justify eliminating safety-net programs. It goes something like this: “You’re personally free to help the poor. But the government has no right to take people’s money” — frequently, at this point, they add the words “at the point of a gun” — “and force them to give it to the poor.”

It is, however, apparently perfectly O.K. to take people’s money at the point of a gun and force them to give it to agribusinesses and the wealthy.

Now, some enemies of food stamps don’t quote libertarian philosophy; they quote the Bible instead. Representative Stephen Fincher of Tennessee, for example, cited the New Testament: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” Sure enough, it turns out that Mr. Fincher has personally received millions in farm subsidies.

[…]

So what’s going on here? Is it just racism? No doubt the old racist canards — like Ronald Reagan’s image of the “strapping young buck” using food stamps to buy a T-bone steak — still have some traction. But these days almost half of food stamp recipients are non-Hispanic whites; in Tennessee, home of the Bible-quoting Mr. Fincher, the number is 63 percent. So it’s not all about race.

What is it about, then? Somehow, one of our nation’s two great parties has become infected by an almost pathological meanspiritedness, a contempt for what CNBC’s Rick Santelli, in the famous rant that launched the Tea Party, called “losers.” If you’re an American, and you’re down on your luck, these people don’t want to help; they want to give you an extra kick. I don’t fully understand it, but it’s a terrible thing to behold.

Well, I’ll say this much for them: they don’t discriminate.  They’re assholes to everybody, including the people who voted for them in this first place.

That’s got to tell you something, too: who would be so blind as to vote against your own self interest?  People who are too blinded by greed, fear, and paranoia to realize it.  Or, as I like to call it, the Republican base.

3 barks and woofs on “Krugman: Hunger Games

    • But if we do that, who do we have to blame for all our troubles?

      /snark

      Seriously, the GOTea is one step short of saying if you’re poor then maybe you shouldn’t be free. If Freedom™ weren’t something they claimed exclusive rights to, chances are they’d be already there.

  1. In Paul Krugman’s 2012 book “End this Depression Now!” he comes heartbreakingly close to connecting the dots between the reduction in the progressivity of the tax system and the cycle of overinvestment that caused the depression. He states that the book is much less concerned with the cause of the depression than what should be done to end it. His prescription is fiscal stimulus focused on the spending side that has even less of a chance of being enacted than the tax cuts suggested above.

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/1543642-a-depression-with-benefits-the-macro-case-for-mreits

Comments are closed.