U.S. ambassador to South Korea attacked.
The Senate tried and failed to override the veto of the Keystone XL pipeline bill.
Iran official says we are “very close” to a deal on nukes.
Boston bomber’s lawyer says he did it in opening statement.
Man burned by fajitas while praying can’t sue.
The House passed a clean DHS funding bill.
The white flag went up on Tuesday afternoon, when House Republican leaders backed down and funded the Department of Homeland Security without the restrictive immigration provisions they had demanded.
The vote was 257-167. Most Republicans voted against it, but Democrats carried it to victory.
The bill passed the Senate last week, and now goes to President Barack Obama who is expected to sign it.
Some conservatives weren’t pleased, and tried to delay the vote by ordering a full reading of the clean DHS legislation.
“I’m very worried because we have a president that’s completely out of control. He’s very comfortable with violating the law and the Constitution,” Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) told reporters. “And if we don’t have a Senate and a House willing to stand up to him … we need to get ready to start defeating some of these things and get serious about it.”
But Fleming said conservative House members wouldn’t try to oust Boehner, despite speculation to the contrary.
“There’s no plan, no discussion about removing the Speaker,” he said.
Not to worry; Mr. Boehner isn’t going to lose his job over this, more’s the pity. The question really should be why does he want it now anyway?
Via Greg Sargent:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that his planned speech to Congress is not meant to signal any disrespect for President Obama, nor to insert political partisanship into the U.S.-Israel relationship.
“Never has so much been written about a speech that hasn’t been given,” Netanyahu said about the address to a joint session of Congress Tuesday. “My speech is not intended to show any disrespect to President Obama or the esteemed office that he holds. I have great respect for both.”
Pull the other one, Bibi; it jingles.
There are now apparently 51 members of Congress not attending Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech tomorrow. Seven Senators and 44 members of the House. The latest is Sen. Al Franken (D). The list is heavily weighted toward African-Americans but also toward Jews. By my count, Franken is the 6th Jewish member of Congress to sit it out.
Sorry, can’t make it; I have monthly projections to get out.
The House is trying to come up with a plan to fund DHS without messing with immigration and pissing off the right wing.
The guy known as Jihad John, the English-speaking executioner of ISIS, has been identified as a Briton.
You’re welcome — Liberia’s president thanked the U.S. for helping them with the Ebola crisis.
The F.C.C. votes in favor of net neutrality.
The Klown Kar is in town.
Three men from Brooklyn were arrested on charges of plotting to foment terrorism in collusion with ISIS.
The Senate moved a clean DHS funding bill towards passage. The House, on the other hand, is not happy about it.
New Fukushima reactor leak went unreported for months.
Morgan Stanley will pay fine of $2.6 billion to settle the mortgage cases.
Chicago voters forced the mayoral election into a run-off.
Way back in grad school I took a course in Asian theatre, including Peking Opera, Noh, and Kabuki. Each form is unique, but the one thing they have in common is that most of the audience knows the stories they’re going to see down to the last detail, they know the rituals of the form, and they have their favorite actors playing their roles. In Peking Opera, an actor will play the same role throughout his entire career; even if he’s in his dotage he will still play the Young Lover. But the audience loves it and they willingly suspend their disbelief for the duration of the performance and will come back time and again to see it over and over.
We’re about to start that on Capitol Hill. The Republican-led Congress passed the Keystone XL pipeline bill. President Obama said he would veto it, and he did. Congress will have a temper tantrum and will try to override the veto, which will fail, and some idiot Teabagger will claim that the president exceeded his authority with the veto pen because, well, you know why.
This will happen again and again. The next one will be some bill to repeal the immigration executive orders followed by something else, and on and on; everybody on stage for the Dance of the Spittle-flecked.
The difference between this ritual and the real Peking Opera is that the theatre production has an orchestra and it’s actually entertaining.
Even after they said they wouldn’t do it, the GOP is working their way toward another government shut-down over the funding of the Department of Homeland Security.
What I want to know is: after all the things they haven’t gotten done, who could tell if they haven’t already shut it down?
For almost five years, the Republicans have vowed to repeal Obamacare and cast it and all of its remnants onto the ash heap of history. They think they see a glimmer of a chance if the Supreme Court decides that indeed the Moops did invade Spain and the typo in the law strips away federal subsidies for states that do not set up healthcare exchanges on their own.
If that happens, then what? Why of course the GOP would step up and unveil their totally different and much better plan for insuring Americans have health insurance.
Oh joy oh rapture, but what’s in it? Paul Waldman sums it up.
What’s really remarkable about this plan is that for all the claims we’ll hear about how it undoes the tyrannical horror of Obamacare, the Republicans’ version of health care reform has accepted most of the fundamental goals and regulatory paths of the law they so deeply despise. This plan — authored by Senators Richard Burr and Orrin Hatch and Rep. Fred Upton — is little more than Obamacare Lite. Though the devil is in the details — and there are some devilish ones — this tells us that Barack Obama has for all intents and purposes won the health care argument, at least as far as it concerns government’s role in health care.
Again and again in the Republican plan, what they do is take a provision or principle in the Affordable Care Act and essentially say, “We want to do that too, we’ll just do it a little less generously.”
The technical insurance term is “bait-and-switch.” You think you’re buying a Shelby GT350 but you’re getting a Yugo.
And, by the way, there’s no guarantee that Congress would even pass this piece of garbage. There are enough right-wing nutjobs who think that illness is God’s will and the government should not help anyone.
ISIS stirs up turmoil in the Middle East after the brutal murder of the Jordanian pilot.
At least 31 people were killed in a plane crash in Taiwan.
Authorities identified the dead in the NY train crash.
Secretary of Defense nominee Ashton Carter had his first day of confirmation hearings.
Michigan will not stand in the way of same-sex marriages that took place last year when the ban was briefly lifted.
The invitation from House Speaker John Boehner to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to a joint session of Congress without consulting with the White House was an obvious attempt to embarrass President Obama and his negotiations with Iran to halt their nuclear program.
But it is not going exactly as planned.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has been reaching out to leading Capitol Hill Democrats to try to ease criticism over his coming address to Congress, but has made little progress.
Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, said Thursday that Mr. Netanyahu had called him the previous afternoon to explain why he had accepted an invitation to speak to Congress without first notifying the White House. The prime minister has also called Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the Senate’s No. 3 Democrat.
“It’s hurting you,” Mr. Reid said he told Mr. Netanyahu. “I said: ‘You have to understand this. I’m not telling you what to do or what not to do, but you have to understand the background here from my perspective.’ ”
“It would have been wrong for me to say, ‘Don’t come,’ ” said Mr. Reid, who is recovering at his home in Washington from a serious exercise accident he sustained Jan. 1. “I wouldn’t do that.”
Ms. Pelosi said late Wednesday that when she spoke with the prime minister, she had stressed that the speech “could send the wrong message in terms of giving diplomacy a chance.”
There have been partisan recriminations in Washington and Israel over the speech, with accusations that Speaker John A. Boehner, who extended the invitation, and Mr. Netanyahu were exploiting the situation for political gain. Mr. Netanyahu faces voters on March 17 in a contest in which national security and Iran could be significant factors. Democrats in Congress have said Mr. Boehner is trying to undermine Mr. Obama and weaken his ability to govern, a charge that Mr. Boehner disputes.
Not only is Bibi bombing out with the Democrats, the invitation is actually working for the president:
For months, the issue of imposing sanctions on Iran split many Democrats from the president, as they feared his posture was emboldening the government in Tehran to further develop its nuclear program. But Mr. Netanyahu’s planned speech, a provocation of the president that many Democrats found distasteful and undiplomatic, has helped shift the political dynamic.
I expect that in the next couple of days we’re going to hear that Mr. Netanyahu suddenly remembered that he has a dental appointment on the very day of the speech and has to cancel the trip.
If, by some logic that escapes an awful lot of people, the Supreme Court guts out Obamacare via this bullshit case King vs. Burwell, it will leave millions of people without the ability to buy healthcare. But never fear, citizens; the Republicans will rush to the rescue and fix it.
Oh, what a relief. But with what?
Many Republicans would view it as a dream come true if the Supreme Court were to slash a centerpiece of Obamacare by the end of June. But that dream could fade into a nightmare as the spotlight turns to the Republican Congress to fix the mayhem that could ensue.
“It’s an opportunity that we’ve failed at for two decades. We’ve not been particularly close to being on the same page on this subject for two decades,” said a congressional Republican health policy aide who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “So this idea — we’re ready to go? Actually no, we’re not.”
Republican leaders recognize the dilemma. In King v. Burwell, they roundly claim the court ought to invalidate insurance subsidies in some three-dozen states, and that Congress must be ready with a response once they do. But conversations with more than a dozen GOP lawmakers and aides indicate that the party is nowhere close to a solution. Outside health policy experts consulted by the Republicans are also at odds on how the party should respond.
The party that has failed to unify behind an alternative to Obamacare for many years now has five months to reach an agreement. It’s an unenviable predicament, especially for the congressional Republicans leading the effort to devise a response — all of whom hail from states that could lose their subsidies.
“There are a lot of ideas,” Senate Finance Committee Chair Orrin Hatch (R-UT) told TPM on Tuesday. “If the case goes the way I think it should go … then we’ve gotta come up with a way of resolving the problems we’re in. We’re quietly looking at all that and trying to do that.”
For now, the GOP’s goal is to “make the world safe for [Chief Justice John] Roberts to overturn” the Obamacare subsidies, said one prominent outside conservative close to Republican lawmakers and the case, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. “What I worry about is — the goal is to not let our guys look like they’re going crazy and letting the world spin into chaos.” In other words, Republicans must show they’re willing and able to deal with the issue.
The upside is that it will provide hours of sardonic mockery of a party that claims to be the adults in the room and can’t do anything; but at the loss of critical care for millions of people who will struggle and suffer because of their incompetence.
“And if I laugh at any mortal thing, ’tis that I may not weep.” — Lord Byron.
Afghan soldier kills three American contractors.
Egypt — Militants attack in Sinai.
Three dead in gas explosion in Mexico City maternity hospital.
Senate passes Keystone XL pipeline bill.
Measles outbreak has Arizona tracking up to 1,000 people exposed.
R.I.P. Poet Rod McKuen, whose words narrated a million teenage crushes.
The next president will get a new plane.
Hezbollah launches attack against Israeli soldiers near the Lebanese border.
Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch had her first day of confirmation hearings in the Senate.
Jordan agreed to terms to trade a prisoner for a hostage held by ISIS.
The Fed cites solid job growth in the economy.
Eight lives left: a cat that was believed to be dead rises from the grave.
Not that it’s any of my business, but why are the Republicans in Congress hell-bent on bringing up two topics — abortion and immigration — that have proven to be toxic for them in recent elections? Do they really want to drive away women and Hispanic voters even more than they already have?
But hey, who am I to tell them what to do. Please proceed.
The Republicans in Congress are finding out that winning elections was the easy part. Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA):
“Week one, we had a Speaker election that didn’t go as well as a lot of us would have liked. Week two, we spent a lot of time talking about deporting children, a conversation a lot of us didn’t want to have. Week three, we’re debating reportable rape and incest — again, not an issue a lot of us wanted to have a conversation about,” the Republican congressman said. “I just can’t wait for week four.”
No wonder they were so cranky when President Obama threw them some shade Tuesday night. As for the fun part, I’m busting a gut.
The Republicans are shocked, shocked to hear the president use the SOTU to put forward a political agenda.
Name one president who didn’t do that.
President Obama laid out a big agenda in the SOTU. Video.
ISIS released a video of two Japanese hostages and demanded ransom.
The presidential palace in Yemen is under rebel control.
Pipeline break leaks thousands of gallons of crude oil into the Yellowstone River in Montana.
Paris mayor plans to sue Fox News for “inaccurate” reporting.
Report: 11 footballs underinflated in Patriots’ game.
Tonight’s the annual ritual of the president coming to the Capitol to deliver the annual address. It’s a big production number, and we all pretty much know how it goes: the president will make a few self-deprecating jokes, he’ll point out a guest in the audience, and then he’ll propose a list of ideas and policies that will get polite applause, and then we’ll all go watch the talking heads until the Republican rebuttal comes along.
Nothing will happen with the president’s plans, by the way, especially with this Congress. They decided six years ago today that they wouldn’t do anything that President Obama asked for and that’s not going to change now that the Republicans are in the majority.
So why does he bother to ask for higher taxes on the rich, tax cuts for the middle class, infrastructure repair, and other dream ticket items for the Democrats? He knows none of them will pass. And doesn’t he know that even if the GOP agreed with some of the items — who can argue with free college? — they wouldn’t touch them because they’re proposed by That Man.
I think there are two reasons why President Obama is going to come out with a big list of to-do’s for the Congress that won’t go anywhere. It will show the audience — the ones not in the chamber — that he’s still got game and ideas, and he’s not about to give up, and that he’s not going to sign whatever cockamamie stuff the Republicans have cooked up. Oh, the president may talk nice about working with the Republicans, but they won’t work with him and so there you have it. We’re back to the way it’s been for six years as of today.
Enjoy the show.
The first bill proposed by the GOP-controlled House was expected to sail through; they even had press releases ready to go hailing the hard work the Congress for getting something done.
Something surprising happened in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives Wednesday afternoon: the chamber, with a large Republican majority, failed to pass a GOP-backed jobs regulation and reform bill.
The bill would have passed with plenty of votes, but since it was treated as a “suspension,” it needed 2/3 of the voting members, and it fell short.