Friday, May 24, 2013

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Friday, May 10, 2013

Short Takes

Turkey’s prime minister says Syria has used chemical weapons.

Border security was all the rage on the first day of immigration law debate.

Jobless claims fall to lowest level in nearly 5-1/2 years.

Take the money and run: Cyber thieves rip off ATM’s to the tune of $45 million.

Good dog — Pets might lower your risk for heart disease.

The Tigers got swept by the Nats.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

More Minority Outreach

The Heritage Foundation, a formerly conservative but now right-wing fringe think tank, has been looking into the immigration issue and come to some interesting conclusions.

First, they claimed that immigration reform would add $5.3 trillion to the deficit, which got even the hard right to blink and question the conclusion.  Then it turns out that in 2009 one of the authors of the study, Jason Richwine (I know; a name straight out of Dickens), suggested that we bar Hispanics from immigrating because they have a lower IQ.

Richwine’s dissertation asserts that there are deep-set differentials in intelligence between races. While it’s clear he thinks it is partly due to genetics — “the totality of the evidence suggests a genetic component to group differences in IQ” — he argues the most important thing is that the differences in group IQs are persistent, for whatever reason. He writes, “No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach IQ parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against.”

Toward the end of the thesis, Richwine writes that though he believes racial differences in IQ to be real and persistent, one need not agree with that to accept his case for basing immigration on IQ. Rather than excluding what he judges to be low-IQ races, we can just test each individual’s IQ and exclude those with low scores. “I believe there is a strong case for IQ selection,” he writes, “since it is theoretically a win-win for the U.S. and potential immigrants.” He does caution against referring to it as IQ-based selection, saying that using the term “skill-based” would “blunt the negative reaction.”

The Heritage Foundation is saying that they have nothing to do with the 2009 study and that they’re not racists or anything.

How very reassuring.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Short Takes

Volcano eruption in the Philippines kills five.

Sexual assaults in the military topped 26,000 in 2012.

Immigration bill faces hundreds of amendments.

Background check bill may get another shot.

Mark Sanford goes back to Congress.

The Dow closed over 15,000 for the first time ever.

R.I.P. Ray Harryhausen, Hollywood master of stop-motion photography.

The Tigers got rained out in Washington.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Defeat Is Victory

Greg Sargent had a piece up the other day about Sen. Marco Rubio’s plan to frame the immigration reform debate in purely win/lose-for-the-GOP terms.

So how can Republicans who want immigration reform get conservatives to accept it, given that Obama also wants it?

Republicans pushing for reform have come up with a strategic answer to that question, one that isn’t really acknowledged openly. They are subtly making the case to their base that a defeat for immigration reform is actually a hidden victory for Obama, and that passing the Senate compromise is actually worse for the President than the alternative, i.e. doing nothing.

In other words, putting the immigration bill in terms that the Republicans can understand — what can we do today to destroy Barack Obama? — they make it an easy proposition.  So pass the Gang of Eight proposal that the president backs and we’ve actually made things worse for him.  That’s all that matters anyway.

It’s like the country is being run by eighth-graders.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Short Takes

U.N. Secretary General appeals to Syria to open up to chemical weapons inspectors.

Iraq — A series of car bombs killed at least 23 people in Shi’ite areas.

Afghan leader confirms cash payments by the C.I.A.

FBI visits Boston bombing suspects widow.

Supreme Court rejects Alabama appeal of immigration law.

Red River crest in North Dakota lowered again.

The Netherlands will get its first king in 120 years.

The Tigers beat the Twins 4-3.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Sunday Reading

Beating Back the Bush — The Sunday chat shows will probably have a few defenders of former President George W. Bush.  Here’s the counterpoints from Alex Seitz-Wald at Salon:

Bush Zoinks 03-04-04Every dog goes to heaven and every former president should get a shot at repairing his legacy, especially when it’s as tattered as George W. Bush’s. With the opening of his presidential library and museum this week, observers from former Bush officials to mainstream outlets were taking a fresh, rosy look at the Bush legacy. Some offered dopey and facially ridiculous cheerleading, while others offered more compelling suggestions to return to the Bush era with an open mind. After all, other presidents left office in a cloud only to be redeemed by history years later.

So, is this week making you feel a bit nostalgic for the Bush era? Don’t. It’s been almost half a decade since the 43rd president left office, and he’s looking as bad as ever. Of course, that won’t stop a small circle of admirers (many of whom used to be on his payroll) from trying, so here’s your guide to taking on the five biggest specious pro-Bush talking points put forward this week:

1) Bush kept us safe: The biggest myth of the Bush presidency, by far, is that the president kept the country safe. As Charles Krauthammer wrote this week in the Washington Post in a typical example: “It’s important to note that he did not just keep us safe. He created the entire anti-terror infrastructure that continues to keep us safe … Which is why there was not one successful terror bombing on U.S. soil from 9/11 until last week.”

Just no. First of all, why does 9/11 not count? It’s not like the U.S. government was completely unaware of the threat from al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden until 9/11. After all, bin Laden had already helped orchestrate the U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania that killed hundreds in 1998, and Bill Clinton launched cruise missiles into Sudan and Afghanistan to try to kill bin Laden three years before 9/11. And then there’s that CIA briefing that warned Bush: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” — 36 days before Sept. 11. Bush’s response to the briefer giving him the news? To say, “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.” Then he went fishing. Literally.

As for the claim that there were no terror attacks on U.S. soil after 9/11 under Bush — also bogus. Conor Friedersdorf writes:

“Bush’s tenure included anthrax attacks that killed five people (more than died in the Boston marathon bombing) and that injured between 22 and 68 people. Bush was president when Hesham Mohamed Hadayet killed two and wounded four at an LAX ticket counter; when the Beltway snipers killed 10 people; when Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar injured six driving his SUV into a crowd; and when Naveed Afzal Haq killed one woman and shot five others in Seattle.”

Also, there was the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen, just before the 2000 election, which should have brought an extra warning about the al-Qaida threat, and later on, bombings in London, Madrid, and Jordan. Meanwhile, thanks to the wars there, much of the attention from international terror went to Iraq and Afghanistan, where al-Qaida and sympathetic groups found it easier to kill American soldiers than to attack Americans on U.S. soil.

There are more, including the howler that Bush was fiscally responsible, and the most egregious one of all: “Iraq wasn’t that bad.”

The Deportation Machine — William Finnegan in The New Yorker on how undocumented workers are treated when they are caught.

You get arrested. The authorities run a background check. They need to know if you have outstanding warrants or unpaid tickets, if you jumped bail somewhere, if you’re driving a stolen vehicle. To obtain your criminal history, they routinely send your fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which keeps a database of more than a hundred million prints. The F.B.I., under a federal program known as Secure Communities, will share your fingerprints with the Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security’s core job—the reason it was created—is to prevent terrorist attacks on the United States. Your prints might reveal that you’re a suspected terrorist. D.H.S. is also charged with border security. Its Immigration and Customs Enforcement arm, ICE, will run your prints through the D.H.S. database—specifically, its U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (U.S.-VISIT) and Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT), which also contain more than a hundred million prints—searching for a match with people wanted for immigration violations. If a match occurs, ICE can issue a “detainer.” Now the local authorities, before they release you, may notify ICE, which may elect to transfer you to federal custody in order to begin deportation proceedings.

Florida Ethics — No, really.  Carl Hiaasen has the scoop.

Promise not to laugh?

An ethics bill was passed last week in Tallahassee.

It’s no joke. The Legislature unanimously approved a law designed to clean up its own sketchy act, and that of elected officials all over the state.

Gov. Rick Scott says he’s “reviewing” the bill. To veto it would be an act of profound cluelessness, but remember who we’re talking about.

The ethics legislation is significant because the concept of enforcing ethical behavior is so foreign to Florida politics. Decades of well-publicized misdeeds and flagrant conflicts of interest have failed to make a moral dent.

A few years ago, lawmakers went through the motions of establishing something called a Commission on Ethics. Most Floridians were unaware of its existence, for good reason. It was a total sham.

Doonesbury — The perpetual question.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Short Takes

Boston bombers learned their stuff on the internet.

Rhode Island is a step closer to marriage equality.

Three charges dropped in abortion doctor murder trial.

DHS Secretary Napolitano says immigration bill will help with border security.

Sen. Max Baucus (D?-MT) is retiring after 2014.

Supreme Court rules that minor offenses don’t warrant deportation.

R.I.P. Allan Arbus, 95, aka Maj. Sidney Freedman on M*A*S*H.

The Tigers got rained out in Kansas City.

Thursday, April 18, 2013

How Quickly They Turn

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is finding out what it’s like to be on the receiving end of the wrath of the orcosphere.

With the release of the “Gang of 8“‘s bipartisan immigration bill today, conservative opponents of reform now have a juicy 844-page target to attack instead of just a set of talking points. Mindful of the risk, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is responding rapidly to rumors and innuendo on the right in the hopes he can shut them down before they spread.

First on the list: the “Marco Phone.” Conservative bloggers immediately seized on portions of the bill funding expanded cell phone access along the border as evidence Rubio was supplying free phones to undocumented immigrants. Some commentators connected it to the “Obama phone,” a popular meme on the right last year about a program that provides discounts on phone service to the poor. Despite the moniker, it predated the current administration by decades and rose to prominence last year mostly due to a viral video of a female black Obama supporter talking about the program.

Rubio himself was confronted with the claim on Wednesday in an interview with conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham, who quoted from a blog post that read “Move over Obama phone, this is the amnesty phone.”

“That’s false,” Rubio said. “That’s not for the illegal immigrants. That’s for U.S. citizens and residents who live in the border region so that they can have access to calls. One of their complaints – that’s actually part of the Kyl border bill that we adopted. And what it does is it provides communication equipment to people who are living in the border region so they can report illegal crossings because many of them either don’t have phone service or don’t have cell phone service and they have no way of calling.”

[...]

There’s some irony to Rubio’s predicament. Conservative commentators derived a multitude of conspiracy theories from misreadings of health care reform bills in 2009 and 2010. The most prominent and ugly claim was that it would create “death panels” that could fatally withdraw care from the elderly and disabled, an outrageously false charge that many national Republicans encouraged, either tacitly or explicitly. Rubio, who became a national star in tea party circles around the same time, is surely well aware just how powerful a rumor can be once it spreads among the conservative base.

Gee, imagine that.  Who could have known?

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Connecting The Dots

As yet, no one with any authority knows who planted the bombs in Boston.  But that does not seem to be stopping certain people of a certain political stripe from jumping to conclusions.

LAURA INGRAHAM: This, in my mind, raises all sorts of questions. I mean, again, we don’t know who did this, motivations, all of that. But it is interesting that at this moment — we are considering legalizing or giving regularized status to millions of people. Pretty much none of them have gone through any rigorous background checks, to have a temporary status in the United States. And we don’t — I just think that there are all sorts of security implications aside from the other arguments on immigration — national security implications that we don’t talk about with enough frankness and I think certitude here. We can’t stop every attack, but my goodness, if we had borders that were shut down and we actually had a proper screening process, maybe we could stop some of them.

Hmm, background checks.  You know, to make sure that people don’t have a criminal record before we let them do something.  Where have I heard her talk about them before?  Oh, yeah; she warned us of the danger to our freedom if we do that for gun purchases, but now it’s okay.

So it’s not okay to have a background check if you want to buy a lethal weapon, but if you’re coming in to the country looking for a new life and a new job, we’d better know when the last time was that you rode on the subway with a guy named Abdul.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Rubio On Immigration

It’s a little more than ironic that Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) should become the spokesperson for the immigration reform bill.  After all, he’s the son of Cuban immigrants, and Cubans are the only ones who don’t have to worry about immigration laws.  All they have to do is show up in the U.S., either by raft or business class on Air Canada, and they’re in, thanks to the Cuban Adjustment Act that waives most of the requirements that everyone else has to go through.

But I guess that the GOP was looking for a Hispanic to shepherd the law and put a pretty face on it, and it’s not like they have a lot of other Latinos to choose from.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Short Takes

North Korea warned foreigners in South Korea to leave the country under threat of attack.

At least 14 people were injured in a stabbing attack at a community college in Texas.

Cuba will return a couple who kidnapped their own children from Tampa.

Possible agreement on background checks sets stage for Senate vote.

“Gang of 8″ immigration bill to be introduced by Thursday.

UConn beats Louisville to win women’s NCAA basketball championship.

The Tigers beat the Blue Jays.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Short Takes

China hints that it’s not too happy with North Korea.

Battle between Taliban vs. Afghan forces kills 20, including children.

Prospects for gun laws are looking a little better on Capitol Hill.

An immigration deal might also be in the works this week.

Rutgers whistle-blower under investigation for extortion.

R.I.P. Lilly Pulitzer, 81, fashion setter of the ’60′s.

The Tigers got shut out by the Yankees.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Short Takes

President Obama faces backlash from left over budget plans; says it’s not “ideal.”

March job numbers were much weaker than expected.

Judge rejects age limits on morning-after pill.

Get with it — Immigration reform advocates tell Marco Rubio to stop dragging his heels.

Fashion Tip — Arizona lawmakers invited to wear bulletproof vests to work.

Deploy the tractor beam — Plans afoot to capture an asteroid.

R.I.P. Milo O’Shea, Irish actor with many credits including The West Wing and The Verdict.

The Tigers beat the Yankees in their home opener.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Stylish

The Associated Press will drop the use of the term “illegal immigrant” from their reporting style book.

Except in direct quotes essential to the story, use illegal only to refer to an action, not a person: illegal immigration, but not illegal immigrant. Acceptable variations include living in or entering a country illegally or without legal permission.

Except in direct quotations, do not use the terms illegal alien, an illegal, illegals or undocumented. Do not describe people as violating immigration laws without attribution. Specify wherever possible how someone entered the country illegally and from where. Crossed the border? Overstayed a visa? What nationality?

Good for them.  Of course the nutsery will accuse them of being “politically correct,” which is always good for a laugh.

Monday, April 1, 2013

Short Takes

Big depositors in Cyprus could lose big in debt deal.

A deal on immigration reform is nigh, according to reports out of the Senate.

Murder in Texas — White supremacists suspected in assassination of D.A.

Oil pipeline ruptures in Arkansas, forcing evacuations.

Also in Arkansas, 1 dead, 3 injured in accident at a nuclear power plant.

Sen. Marco Rubio plans filibuster over gun legislation.

Mississippi bans soft drinks smaller than 20 ounces.

75-car pile-up on Virginia/North Carolina border kills at least one.

Rabbit, rabbit, rabbit.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Short Takes

Cyprus — Bailout plan causes panic around the world.

Syrian rebels elect U.S. citizen as its prime minister.

A student who took his own life at the University of Central Florida had planned a campus attack.

Arizona’s immigration law gets a grilling at the Supreme Court.

FBI says it knows who stole millions of dollars worth of art in Boston in 1990.

Cosmic Events — There’s a snowstorm headed for the Northeast, and the sun is shooting out huge flares.

Monday, March 11, 2013

Jeb’s Complete Spin Cycle

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has come back to his original immigration stand after a week out there in the fringes.

Jeb Bush completed a whirlwind one-week journey on immigration on Sunday, praising a Senate proposal to grant eventual citizenship for undocumented immigrants after attacking the idea in a newly released book he co-authored that was itself a reversal of his past position.

Bush’s experimental turn as a border hawk was so quick you could blink and miss it.

He did all five Sunday talk shows (there are five now?) yesterday where he basically re-embraced a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.  This was exactly a week after he’d flipped from his earlier position of no path… then sorta a path after his book came out (and contradicted his own writings)… and then back on the path yesterday.

So why the sudden reversal?  Or why the original change in the first place?  Who knows, but it accomplished the goal of getting his name out there.  And to prove that he’s a player, he’s got the chutzpah to chastise the press for pestering him about running in 2016, comparing them to crack addicts.  As if the question would never come up.

Another bon mot that he laid on the press: “I think history will be kind to George W. Bush.”  Okay, who wants to hit that one out of the park?

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Sunday Reading

The Good, Racist People — Ta-Nehisi Coates on the fact that even today an Oscar-nominated winning actor — Forrest Whitaker — can be suspected of being a shoplifter because of the color of his skin.

In modern America we believe racism to be the property of the uniquely villainous and morally deformed, the ideology of trolls, gorgons and orcs. We believe this even when we are actually being racist. In 1957, neighbors in Levittown, Pa., uniting under the flag of segregation, wrote: “As moral, religious and law-abiding citizens, we feel that we are unprejudiced and undiscriminating in our wish to keep our community a closed community.”

A half-century later little had changed. The comedian Michael Richards (Kramer on “Seinfeld”) once yelled at a black heckler from the stage: “He’s a nigger! He’s a nigger! He’s a nigger!” Confronted about this, Richards apologized and then said, “I’m not a racist,” and called the claim “insane.”

The idea that racism lives in the heart of particularly evil individuals, as opposed to the heart of a democratic society, is reinforcing to anyone who might, from time to time, find their tongue sprinting ahead of their discretion. We can forgive Whitaker’s assailant. Much harder to forgive is all that makes Whitaker stand out in the first place. New York is a city, like most in America, that bears the scars of redlining, blockbusting and urban renewal. The ghost of those policies haunts us in a wealth gap between blacks and whites that has actually gotten worse over the past 20 years.

But much worse, it haunts black people with a kind of invisible violence that is given tell only when the victim happens to be an Oscar winner. The promise of America is that those who play by the rules, who observe the norms of the “middle class,” will be treated as such. But this injunction is only half-enforced when it comes to black people, in large part because we were never meant to be part of the American story. Forest Whitaker fits that bill, and he was addressed as such.

I am trying to imagine a white president forced to show his papers at a national news conference, and coming up blank. I am trying to a imagine a prominent white Harvard professor arrested for breaking into his own home, and coming up with nothing. I am trying to see Sean Penn or Nicolas Cage being frisked at an upscale deli, and I find myself laughing in the dark. It is worth considering the messaging here. It says to black kids: “Don’t leave home. They don’t want you around.” It is messaging propagated by moral people.

The other day I walked past this particular deli. I believe its owners to be good people. I felt ashamed at withholding business for something far beyond the merchant’s reach. I mentioned this to my wife. My wife is not like me. When she was 6, a little white boy called her cousin a nigger, and it has been war ever since. “What if they did that to your son?” she asked.

And right then I knew that I was tired of good people, that I had had all the good people I could take.

The “Undocuqueers” – Benjy Sarlin at TPM on the hurdles that remain for gay couples with immigration issues.

A report released Friday by the Williams Institute at UCLA calculated that out of the 11 million undocumented immigrants estimated to be America today, 267,000 adults identify as LGBT. Another 637,000 LGBT adults were legal immigrants. Gary Gates, a scholar at the Williams Institute, said that the number was a conservative estimate based on cross-referencing survey data on undocumented immigrants, sexual orientation, along with data on married same sex couples. Gates’ remarks came at an event in Washington, D.C., debuting the finding that was hosted by the liberal Center for American Progress.

There are some issues gay and immigrant rights groups are looking to address that concern specifically LGBT immigrants, for example greater sensitivity towards gay and transgendered detainees taken into custody by ICE. But the dominant issue affects U.S. citizens and immigrants alike: the ability to sponsor one’s partner or spouse for a visa.

The Defense of Marriage Act, now under review by the Supreme Court, bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex couples. That means that the usual laws allowing citizens to bring foreign-born husbands or wives to America under a family visa don’t apply. The result is often that couples are forced into effective exile: the popular progressive blogger Glenn Greenwald, for example, lives in Brazil with his partner because only Brazilian law recognizes their relationship and grants Greenwald permanent residency.

According to the Williams Institute, the nation is home to an estimated 32,300 same-sex binational couples in which one spouse is an American and the other a non-citizen. According to Gates, more than half have children, meaning entire families face the prospect of being split apart if a foreign partner or spouse can’t find an alternative visa through work, school, or other family relationships — a process that can take years in the best of circumstances.

Jose Antonio Vargas, a journalist and activist who revealed in 2011 that he himself was an undocumented immigrant, said at CAP’s event on Friday that his grandfather was upset when he came out as gay in part because it closed off one possible avenue to citizenship.

“I ruined the plan,” he said. “The plan was to come to America, marry a woman, and get my papers that way.”

Sleepytime — Elizabeth Kolbert in The New Yorker:  The science of sleep is an eye-opener.

Of the many ways that things can go wrong in bed, sleep troubles are probably the most prevalent. According to a 2011 poll, more than half of Americans between the ages of thirteen and sixty-four experience a sleep problem almost every night, and nearly two-thirds complain that they are not getting enough rest during the week. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that fifty to seventy million Americans suffer from a “chronic disorder of sleep and wakefulness.” The results are dangerous as well as annoying. A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that almost five per cent of adults acknowledge nodding off at the wheel at least once during the previous month. The U.S. Department of Transportation has determined that what might be called D.W.D.—driving while drowsy—causes forty thousand injuries a year in the United States and more than fifteen hundred deaths.

Our collective weariness is the subject of several new books, some by professionals who study sleep, others by amateurs who are short of it. David K. Randall’s “Dreamland: Adventures in the Strange Science of Sleep” belongs to the latter category. It’s a good book to pick up during a bout of insomnia.

Randall begins with an account of his own sleep problems, which include laughing, humming, grunting, bouncing, kicking, and, on at least one occasion, sleep-walking into a wall. He considers a range of possible explanations for the national exhaustion—too much light, too much warmth, too much avoirdupois—and finds them all compelling. The electric light bulb has made darkness optional, eliminating the enforced idleness that used to begin at sunset. Modern mattresses and bedclothes trap the heat that the body gives off as its core temperature drops each night. Obesity increases the chances of developing sleep apnea, a condition that combines choking and waking in an exhausting, sometimes life-threatening cycle. For all these reasons and more, Randall anticipates a bright future for the emerging field of “fatigue management.” One sleep expert he interviews predicts that “fatigue management officers” will soon be as common at major corporations as accountants. Like time, sleep, it turns out, is money.

Doonesbury — Soul-searching.