What does it take to buy a decent election these days?
At this point in the 2012 presidential race, Terry Neese was in hot demand.
“Gosh, I was hearing from everyone and meeting with everyone,” said Neese, an Oklahoma City entrepreneur and former “Ranger” for President George W. Bush who raised more than $1 million for his reelection.
This year, no potential White House contender has called — not even Bush’s brother, Jeb. As of early Wednesday, the only contacts she had received were e-mails from staffers for two other likely candidates; both went to her spam folder.
“They are only going to people who are multi-multimillionaires and billionaires and raising big money first,” said Neese, who founded a successful employment agency. “Most of the people I talk to are kind of rolling their eyes and saying, ‘You know, we just don’t count anymore.’ ”
It’s the lament of the rich who are not quite rich enough for 2016.
Bundlers who used to carry platinum status have been downgraded, forced to temporarily watch the money race from the sidelines. They’ve been eclipsed by the uber-wealthy, who can dash off a seven-figure check to a super PAC without blinking. Who needs a bundler when you have a billionaire?
Many fundraisers, once treated like royalty because of their extensive donor networks, are left pining for their lost prestige. Can they still have impact in a world where Jeb Bush asks big donors to please not give more than $1 million to his super PAC right now? Will they ever be in the inner circle again?
“A couple presidential elections ago, somebody who had raised, say, $100,000 for a candidate was viewed as a fairly valuable asset,” said Washington lobbyist Kenneth Kies. “Today, that looks like peanuts. People like me are probably looking around saying, ‘How can I do anything that even registers on the Richter scale?’ ”
Gee, you mean that you’ll just have to do like the rest of the 99.9% of the country? What are we coming to?
Gunmen in Tunis kill 19 in museum.
Netanyahu vows to form new government.
Japan probes death threats against Ambassador Caroline Kennedy.
Suspect captured in Arizona shooting spree.
The Fed didn’t make any waves on the economy.
ISIS is being beaten back from Tikrit by Iraqi forces.
The Israel election is next week and getting close between the rivals.
The University of Oklahoma expelled two students connected with the SAE racist video.
President Obama signed the “Student Aid Bill of Rights” law.
Stocks fall on strong dollar worries.
Gun ownership is down in America.
Keeping it classy: North Korea says attack on U.S. ambassador “punishment.”
Minor injuries reported as plane skids off runway at La Guardia.
Iraq says ISIS destroyed archaeological sites near Mosul.
Harrison Ford reported in fair condition after small plane crash.
For the first time in 30 years, unemployment fell in every state in 2014.
Defense Secretary Carter made his first trip to Afghanistan.
President Obama wants to shield seniors from retirement plan grifters.
Dock workers on the West Coast have a tentative agreement to settle their strike.
The endless winter continues in the South and Northeast.
Never too late: 94-year-old charged with serving at Auschwitz.
Germany says nein to Greece’s proposal to resolve its debt crisis.
President Obama calls for expansion of human rights to fight extremism.
Wal-Mart to pay $10 an hour minimum wage.
Superbug — Nearly 180 people may have been exposed to a deadly virus at a hospital in Los Angeles.
A first for Texas: a same-sex couple were granted a one-time-only marriage license.
Brrrr — Cold wave strikes the Midwest and East Coast.
Where there’s gold, there’s fools, and there’s always someone who’s going to con them out of it.
Anyone who follows the conservative movement carefully could tell you that it’s about 25 percent politics and 75 percent mail-order scam. For more than half a century now, charlatans passing themselves off as conservative leaders have exploited ordinary conservatives’ anxiety about a changing America to collect addresses and now email lists in order to sell snake oil and raise funds that followers believe are going to political causes but frequently just line the pockets of the con artists. The conservative tendency to con their own people occasionally piques the interest of the liberal media. Media Matters, for instance, has run exposes on how conservative luminaries like Mike Huckabee and Scott Brown sold their mailing lists to con artists peddling fake “cures” for Alzheimer’s and cancer. Rachel Maddow has been reporting for years on how Newt Gingrich scams money off his followers through direct mail offers of “awards” and by trying to rope them into fraudulent investments.
But, until recently, even the more reputable conservative outlets have remained mum about their fellows’ habit of bilking their followers. Fox News even keeps bringing one of the worst offenders, Mike Huckabee, on air over and over, making it all the easier for him to earn the trust of viewers and then to sell them out to snake-oil salesmen.
But there are signs that some of the most rigidly conservative rightwing writers out there are getting sick of it and are ready to speak out. On Tuesday, Jonah Goldberg of the National Review highlighted a report from John Hawkins of Right Wing News that exposed how many of the Tea Party-style PACs are basically taking money gullible donors think is going to elect conservative politicians and using it for basically anything but that. Ten of the 17 PACs examined by Hawkins took in more than $50 million and only spent about $3.6 million of it on campaigns. SarahPAC, run by Sarah Palin, was a typical offender, spending only $205,000 of their $3 million, or about 7 percent of the funds.
Con men — and women — are in every business, from healthcare to computer fixes, but the gullible on the right are an especially ripe target. After all, if they’ll believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, is Muslim, gay, and is the love child of Martin Luther King and Agatha Christie, then they’ll certainly send $10 to anyone who asks.
I’d be curious to know just how many regular observers of the American political scene are not at all surprised that the newest Republican mantra is that income inequality is bad and that the Democrats are the cause of it.
That would probably be about the same number of people who were shocked to hear that liberals are the real racists, that Christians are the innocent victims of vicious religious persecution by the LGBT community, and that sharks are the true vegetarians of the ocean.
Jordanian air force hits ISIS targets.
U.S. and European allies work to find peace in Ukraine.
NTSB says train engineer hit emergency brakes before NY fatal crash.
Anthem Healthcare hacked; up to 8 million records stolen.
Radio Shack files for bankruptcy.
Seven dead in NY train wreck.
Jordan executes two ISIS prisoners to avenge killing of pilot.
Argentinian prosecutor had a warrant for the country’s president when he died.
S&P must pay over $1 billion in fines for its role in the financial crash of 2008.
Senate passes veterans’ suicide prevention bill 99-0.
Alabama could start same-sex marriage as early as February 9.
It’s a big deal when a court rules or a state passes a law that allows marriage equality in a state. The cameras roll, the happy couples embrace on the courthouse steps, the confetti flies, and of course the wingnuts have their pouts. It is a big deal when fundamental rights are recognized and generations of mistreatment and shaming are put to an end.
The landmark Supreme Court ruling United States v. Windsor in 2013 that overturned the odious Defense of Marriage Act was not about two women getting married. It was about the surviving spouse’s inheritance rights, the same that would accrue had they been an opposite-sex couple. That was the ruling that got us where we are with marriage equality today. It was about more than just getting married; it was about the little things that make up the life that every straight couple takes for granted.
So it’s good to see that while President Obama embraces the idea of marriage equality, he’s also trying to insure that the rest comes along with it.
President Barack Obama’s $4 trillion budget proposal includes a major change to the Social Security Act that would allow same-sex couples to receive spousal benefits even if they live in states that don’t recognize such unions.
Under current law, gay couples who move from one of the 36 states that permit same-sex marriage to one that does not lose the Social Security benefits heterosexual couples enjoy. “Under this proposal, such married couples would have access to these benefits,” according to the budget.
It’s the first time Obama has suggested such a change, though he stated his personal support for gay marriage in 2012. Last year, the president went further, telling the New Yorker’s Jeffery Toobin that he believes the Equal Protection Clause in the U.S. Constitution “does guarantee” same-sex marriage in all 50 states.
It will take an act of Congress to make it happen, but it’s a start.
The U.S. and North Korea are holding secret talks about nukes.
The CDC warned against a “large outbreak” of measles.
The Northeast faces another blast of winter.
President Obama’s new budget includes GOP bait.
He’s alive — Cuba publishes photos of Fidel.
Another big snow hits the Northeast.
ISIS claims to have killed another hostage.
U.S. looks at arming Ukraine forces.
Obama budget aims to reduce income inequality.
Mayor Collins of Toledo suffers heart attack; condition critical.
New England won the Super Bowl.
GOP candidates scramble after Romney’s donors.
Florida prisons chief knocks Gov. Scott over law enforcement scandal.
Hezbollah launches attack against Israeli soldiers near the Lebanese border.
Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch had her first day of confirmation hearings in the Senate.
Jordan agreed to terms to trade a prisoner for a hostage held by ISIS.
The Fed cites solid job growth in the economy.
Eight lives left: a cat that was believed to be dead rises from the grave.
The blizzard in New England isn’t over yet.
Americans among those killed in a terrorist attack on a hotel in Libya.
A lot of people, including President Obama, showed up to pay respects in Saudi Arabia.
Consumer confidence is at its highest rating since 2007.
Mormons try to balance marriage equality and the right to discriminate.
Obamacare cost estimate keeps getting smaller.
How do you say chutzpah in Kansas?
Gov. Sam Brownback blames his draconian tax cuts and budget deficits on the state legislature. No, really.
“I proposed a flat tax with a small budget accelerator,” Brownback said Friday during an address to the Great Topeka Chamber of Commerce, according to The Topeka Capital-Journal. “What I got from the Legislature was a naked tax cut with none of the pay-fors.”
Brownback added that he “took it because it was the best we were going to get.”
Yes, apparently they held a gun to his head and said either his brains or his signature would be on the bill. What choice did he have?
Here we go with the real reason the Republicans don’t want to raise the minimum wage: those people aren’t worth it.
California Republican Rep. Tom McClintock said on Thursday that the minimum wage should not be raised because low pay was necessary for minorities and other unskilled workers who were not worth more than $7 an hour.
During an appearance on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal, host Greta Brawner asked McClintock if he could get behind a presidential candidate like Mitt Romney, who is one of an increasing number of Republicans saying that the minimum wage should be at least $10.10 an hour.
But McClintock argued that raising the minimum wage would “rip the first rung in the ladder of opportunity for teenagers, for minorities, for people who are trying to get into the job market for their first job.”
Mr. McClintock sounds like an unskilled worker himself.
Digby notes an interesting phenomenon: certain people get hysterical when there’s an attack that is labeled as terrorism (i.e. Charlie Hebdo). They want to declare war against international Islam and shred up the Constitution to protect us. Yet when there’s a school shooting (i.e. Sandy Hook) these same people get all cautious about a rush to judgment and very protective of civil liberties.
Why is that?
I can think of two reasons. First, to them any connection to Islam — even if it’s tenuous or done by a fringe splinter offshoot of some tiny faction — makes it The Gravest Threat to America. So the shooter could have dated a girl whose brother once bought a car from a guy who lived next door to a man named Mustaffah and all of a sudden he’s a jihadist. Or he could claim allegiance to a radical group that is says it is rooted in Islam but is made up of three other guys who are holed up in a studio apartment in Niwot, Colorado, and making meth on the side. It doesn’t matter; he’s a believer in Islam, therefore all Muslims are terrorists and they should be hunted down. By that logic, all Christians should be hunted down because David Koresh at Waco claimed to be a Christian.
A school shooter, however, goes in with a gun he bought at a gun show and gets his ammo over the internet. He shows up at a campus and slaughter ensues. But it happens in America and he has a copy of American Rifleman sitting on his coffee table when the CSI team shows up to gather evidence. Now he’s a lone wolf acting on his own using weapons he purchased legally, and while Wayne LaPierre says it’s a tragedy, there’s no reason to suggest that there’s any need to question his right to own thirty rifles, their barrels shined to a steely glow, and any attempt to prevent such future tragedies will destroy America’s dearly-won freedoms. Just because he — and it’s always a he — was a card-carrying member of the NRA doesn’t mean that all gun owners are capable of mowing down school kids at thirty bullets per second.
So if it’s wrong to demonize an entire community based on the actions of one person or small group of believers, why does that apply to the NRA but not to Islam? It shouldn’t, but then it’s a lot easier to demonize Other People than it is to piss off the base of a political party and the largest lobbying effort in Washington.
That’s the second reason. If elected officials weren’t terrorized by the NRA, we’d have Newt Gingrich and the rest of the Chicken Hawks on cable TV demanding that Congress do something about the guns, and if the NRA doesn’t like it, well, they’d have to realize, just as Pope Francis says, that there are limits to freedom.
Oh, the humanity.
JPMorgan Chase & Co, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, reported a 6.6 percent drop in quarterly profit as legal costs exceeded $1 billion in the wake of government probes, leading Chief Executive Jamie Dimon to claim banks were “under assault.”
JPMorgan agreed in November to pay $1 billion in penalties over its conduct in foreign exchange markets. Investigations into that and other areas of the bank’s business, including alleged manipulation of Libor interest rates, are continuing.
“Banks are under assault,” Dimon said on a call with reporters, responding to a question about legal costs.
“We have five or six regulators coming at us on every issue,” he said, taking a less conciliatory tone after admitting last year that he had a “tin ear” when dealing with officialdom.
However, while legal expenses rose to $1.1 billion in the fourth quarter, from $847 million a year earlier, total legal costs of $2.9 billion for the year were far less than the $11.1 billion recorded in 2013.
Poor Jamie. He’ll have to sell off one of the houses in the Hamptons to pay for his lawyers. How can he live like this?
Charlie Hebdo comes out with its next issue.
France’s parliament voted to increase strikes against ISIS.
Supreme Court denies stay in execution of vet with PTSD.
Jobless rates continue to fall.
Charges filed against bartender who plotted to poison John Boehner.
Happy birthday, Lucy.