Harold Meyerson on Bush’s need to create crises:
Some presidents make the history books by managing crises. Lincoln had Fort Sumter, Roosevelt had the Depression and Pearl Harbor, and Kennedy had the missiles in Cuba. George W. Bush, of course, had Sept. 11, and for a while thereafter — through the overthrow of the Taliban — he earned his page in history, too.
But when historians look back at the Bush presidency, they’re more likely to note that what sets Bush apart is not the crises he managed but the crises he fabricated. The fabricated crisis is the hallmark of the Bush presidency. To attain goals that he had set for himself before he took office — the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the privatization of Social Security — he concocted crises where there were none.
In short, Social Security is not facing a financial crisis at all. It is facing a need for some distinctly sub-cataclysmic adjustments over the next few decades that would increase its revenue and diminish its benefits.
Politically, however, Social Security is facing the gravest crisis it has ever known. For the first time in its history, it is confronted by a president, and just possibly by a working congressional majority, who are opposed to the program on ideological grounds, who view the New Deal as a repealable aberration in U.S. history, who would have voted against establishing the program had they been in Congress in 1935. But Bush doesn’t need Karl Rove’s counsel to know that repealing Social Security for reasons of ideology is a non-starter.
So it’s time once more to fabricate a crisis. In Bushland, it’s always time to fabricate a crisis. We have a crisis in medical malpractice costs, though the CBO says that malpractice costs amount to less than 2 percent of total health care costs. (In fact, what we have is a president who wants to diminish the financial, and thus political, clout of trial lawyers.) We have a crisis in judicial vacancies, though in fact Senate Democrats used the filibuster to block just 10 of Bush’s 229 first-term judicial appointments.
With crisis concoction as its central task — think of how many administration officials issued dire warnings of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein or, now, by Social Security’s impending bankruptcy — this presidency, more than any I can think of, has relied on the classic tools of propaganda. Indeed, it’s almost impossible to imagine the Bush presidency absent the Fox News Network and right-wing talk radio.
Is it any wonder that the Education Department paid commentator Armstrong Williams $241,000 to promote its No Child Left Behind programs? In this administration, it is the role of a government agency to turn out pro-Bush news by whatever means possible. Fox News viewership in the African American community wasn’t very large, and here was Williams, who seemed to have learned during his clerkship for Clarence Thomas that it was rude to decline any gifts.
We’ve had plenty of presidents, Richard Nixon most notoriously, who divided the media into friendly and enemy camps. I can’t think of one, however, so fundamentally invested in the spread of disinformation — and so fundamentally indifferent to the corrosive effect of propaganda on democracy — as Bush. That, too, should earn him a page in the history books.
Forty years ago, presidential scholars worried about the “credibility gap” that was building up between the American people and then-President Johnson and his reasons for getting America involved in the war in Vietnam. They were concerned that Americans would lose faith in their leader and never be able to trust what he told us if it was proved – as it was – that our reasons for going to war in Southeast Asia were false or misleading. This gap was compounded by Johnson’s successor, Richard Nixon. But by the time we got to the Reagan administration it was just taken as a matter of course that whatever came out of the White House was pure spin for public consumption and part of the political fabric. Every opposition candidate for the presidency since LBJ has run on the mantra of “restoring honor and dignity to the office,” and the electorate, to the credit of American optimism – or naivete – has bought into it. Bush’s policy of fabricating crises and believing he can get the population to go along with it is just another example of the symbiosis between the cynical and the duped.