Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Hip Replacement

There are some people who have no business trying to be hip, but it’s kind of fun to watch them try.

Michael Barone is trying it by figuring out how blogs work, and from his point of view, which is from Karl Rove’s knee, the left side of the blogosphere is full of frothing Bush haters while the right side is made up of courageous crusaders for truth, justice, and the Patriot Act.

The Democratic Internet constituency was and is motivated by one thing more than anything else: hatred of George W. Bush. To see that you only have to take a look at dailykos.com, run by Democratic consultant Markos Moulitsas, which gets 400,000 page views a day–far more than any other political weblog–and which received funding from the Dean campaign (which Moulitsas disclosed). It seethes with hatred of Bush, constantly attacks Republicans, and excoriates Democrats who don’t oppose Bush root and branch. When four American contractors were killed in Iraq in April 2004, dailykos.com wrote, “I feel nothing over the death of the mercenaries. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them.” This repulsive comment produced no drop-off in page views. This was what the left blogosphere wanted. Kos was an early enthusiast for Dean’s campaign for Democratic chairman and disparaged other candidates.

For 12 years, Democratic chairmen were chosen by Bill Clinton. He built a new generation of fundraisers who relished contact with the Clintons. Now the big money comes from the left blogosphere and Bush-hating billionaires like George Soros. Dean gives them what they want. As Dean says, “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for.” Hate. But Bush hatred was not enough to beat Bush in 2004–while Democratic turnout was up, Republican turnout was up more–and doesn’t seem likely to beat Republicans in 2006 and 2008. The left blogosphere has driven the Democrats into an electoral cul de sac.

[…]

The Bush campaign, quietly, used the Internet to build an E-mail list of 7.5 million names and a corps of 1.4 million volunteers who produced more new votes than the Democrats. But the right blogosphere was different from the left. There was no one dominant website and no one orthodoxy. Glenn Reynolds, the University of Tennessee law professor whose instapundit.com gets 200,000 page hits a day, supports Bush on Iraq but disagrees with him on abortion, stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage. The focus of hatred in the right blogosphere is not Kerry or the Democrats but what these bloggers call Mainstream Media, or MSM. They argue, correctly in my view, that the New York Times, CBS News, and others distorted the news in an attempt to defeat Bush in 2004.

The right blogosphere’s greatest triumph came after CBS’s Dan Rather on September 8 reported that Bush had shirked duty in the National Guard and the network posted its 1972-dated documents on the Web. Within four hours, a blogger on freerepublic.com pointed out that they looked as though they had been created in Microsoft Word; the next morning, Scott Johnson of powerlineblog.com relayed the comment and asked for expert views. Charles Johnson of littlegreenfootballs.com showed that the documents exactly matched one he produced in Word using default settings. CBS defended the documents for 11 days but finally confessed error and eased Rather out as anchor. MSM tried to defeat Bush but instead only discredited itself. The Pew Center’s post-election poll showed a sharp decline in the credibility of newspapers and broadcast TV and a sharp increase in reliance on cable news, especially Fox News, and radio.

So what hath the blogosphere wrought? The left blogosphere has moved the Democrats off to the left, and the right blogosphere has undermined the credibility of the Republicans’ adversaries in Old Media. Both changes help Bush and the Republicans.

It’s interesting that Barone passes over the rabid hatred in the Freeper comments when anything left of the Third Reich comes up while Kos took his share of lumps from the left for his intemperate posting on mercenaries. Interesting also that Barone seems to have forgotten that dirt-digging and hate-monger blogging didn’t start with the campaign of 2004 but back in the the ancient days of 1999 and the Drudge Report. As for there being “no one orthodoxy” on the right, well, fine; just stay off Free Republic or Town Hall. Assuming there is on the left and assuming it’s Kos ignores the hundreds of other voices on the left such as Eschaton, Corrente, Talking Points Memo, James Wolcott, Trish Wilson, iddybud, T.Rex, Dohiyi Mir, Pandagon, Collective Sigh, BlondeSense, Ezra Klein, and dare I even say it, Bark Bark Woof Woof. Try and tell anyone that all of those bloggers agree about everything on the left. Good luck, fella.

Or perhaps Barone is trying to prove his hipness by going against the conventional wisdom that the Republicans are the ones who are disciplined and on-message with a unified front while the Democrats couldn’t organize a one-car parade. Barone’s got the real inside scoop; the Republicans are the adventurous ones while the Democrats all march lockstep in hatred. See, he is hip after all.

Or maybe he’s just a dingbat.

[Updated to activate some links.]