Thursday, November 7, 2013

Devil In The Details

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wonders if devil worshipers will show up at town meetings.

He made his remark while interjecting during a line of questioning by Justice Samuel Alito about whether any conceivable prayer could simultaneously be acceptable to Christians, Jews, Muslims and Hindus.

“What about devil worshippers?” Scalia said, to laughs in the chamber.

The jurist, a devout Catholic, defended a practice by a town in New York named Greece of holding prayers during open board meetings, arguing that citizens have a right to free exercise of religion. He argued that it’s not a plausible to require that a prayer satisfy everyone’s beliefs.

“What is the equivalent of prayer for someone who is not religious?” Scalia said. “There are many people who do not believe in God. … If you had an atheist [town] board, you would not have any prayer. I guarantee you.”

Scalia recently told New York magazine in an interview that he believes in the devil. “Of course! Yeah, he’s a real person,” the justice said. “In the Gospels, the Devil is doing all sorts of things. He’s making pigs run off cliffs, he’s possessing people and whatnot. And that doesn’t happen very much anymore.”

Whatever gets you through the night, but c’mon…seriously?

2 barks and woofs on “Devil In The Details

  1. Scalia recently told New York magazine in an interview that he believes in the devil. “Of course! Yeah, he’s a real person,” the justice said. “In the Gospels, the Devil is doing all sorts of things. He’s making pigs run off cliffs, he’s possessing people and whatnot. And that doesn’t happen very much anymore.”

    Yup, Old Scratch moved to Washington, bought himself a black robe, and hands down edicts like “you can’t control your own body, lady, only we can” and “you can’t marry who you want” and “oh, ya got sick? Well, die soon.” And he makes all the stereotypical TV Italians seem like Downton Abbey by comparison.

  2. Scalia needs to stick to what he marginally can call his area of expertise; i.e. the law (which some say is an ass) and not dabble where he is as a child and amateurish at best; i.e. biblical exegesis.

Comments are closed.