Thursday, September 6, 2018

From The Resistance

You’ve heard about it, maybe even read parts of it.  Without further ado, the New York Times anonymous op-ed from someone within the Trump White House.

President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.

It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.

The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

I would know. I am one of them.

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.

The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.

Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.

In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.

From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.

Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.

“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.

The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.

It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.

The result is a two-track presidency.

Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.

Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.

On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.

Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.

We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.

There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.

The writer is a senior official in the Trump administration.

As mind-blowing as this is, I’d be even more amazed if this resulted in anything more than the current stream of breathless breaking news from the cable channels.

Because it’s anonymous and from within the administration, this is only going to prove to the Trumpistas and the base that there is indeed a conspiracy within the White House — call it Deep State, call it Qanon, call it your Aunt Mathilda’s dentures picking up signals from Mars — to thwart their Dear Leader from accomplishing the mission sent down from Jesus H. Christ and the guardian angels.

As they say, whoever wrote this believes they can accomplish more by staying in their job and doing what they can to save the country from Trump.  There is some logic in that; as LBJ so pithily put it, it’s better to have someone inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.  And perhaps by providing a check, some of the other minions of Trump will be more guarded in how they support him in his flights of bizarre fancy and tangents.  It may provide some protection for the rest of us and the world when it becomes so apparent that even someone who signed on to work for Trump, knowing full well what he was like before going in, becomes so concerned that they would take this stand.  Perhaps more people in the West Wing and on Capitol Hill will realize that it’s better to take steps to keep him away from sharp objects and nuclear footballs than it is to stand outside the fence and holler.

They may be right.  If they were to quit, they’d be replaced by some sycophant who will have no qualms about fulfilling the fevered dreams of someone wanting world domination and unlimited pussy-grabbing.  But as much as I’d like to see this be the push that becomes the shove to invoking the 25th Amendment or even articles of impeachment, I have my doubts.  Until the Resistance can gain the support and the power of those who can actually do something other than write for the New York Times, as Seven of Nine would put it, resistance is futile.

One bark on “From The Resistance

  1. Since you wrote this before the crack of dawn, an interesting bit of speculation has emerged. The writer believes “Anonymous” is Mike Pence based on the use of the word of “lodestar”, a term he loves to use. I find that stunning. I’ve long despised Pence, even since he was governor of Indiana because of his holier-than-thou approach to everything from birth control and gay rights to sentencing. I think the half-baked courage it took to write the op-ed doesn’t seem to fit what we’ve known about Pence. Still, I’ll be interested in the coming coming-out. No secret is safe these days.

Comments are closed.