Monday, December 17, 2018

Embarrassingly Bad

The late Friday news that a conservative judge in Texas ruled the ACA aka Obamacare unconstitutional brought swift condemnation from legal scholars on both sides of the argument.

Ted Frank, a lawyer at the Competitive Enterprise Institute who is critical of the ACA, called the decision “embarrassingly bad” because “you’re twisting yourself into knots” to reach a particular conclusion.

Over the past two years, Frank said, he and other conservative lawyers have complained when district court judges did similar intellectual gymnastics to attack Trump administration initiatives. “It’s not appropriate in the other direction, either,” he said.

Nicholas Bagley, a University of Michigan law professor, predicted “a long slog” while the courts wrestle with O’Connor’s decision.

“I think this case is frivolous, and I think the judge’s opinion is about as naked a piece of judicial activism as I have ever seen; I don’t even think it’s close,” said Bagley, who supports the ACA. “Like any lawsuit, you should take it seriously, but I don’t think this is an imminent or mortal threat to the Affordable Care Act.”

Since I only studied law at the feet of Jack McCoy, I defer to the real attorneys, but in my humble opinion, Judge O’Connor arrived at his ruling beforehand and then went on a turd-hunt to find something in the law and its history to support it.  He did so when Congress reduced the penalty for not buying health insurance to zero.

This ruling will undoubtedly be appealed just in time for the 2020 election and pitting the GOP and their candidate who crowed on Twitter about the wonderfulness of the ruling against the 20 million people whose health insurance and lives are placed in jeopardy if, by some insane logic, (hi, Clarence Thomas), it is allowed to stand by the Supreme Court.

I can’t wait to see how they’re going to talk their way out of this one.

2 barks and woofs on “Embarrassingly Bad

  1. This judge is one of a dozen or more with ultraconservative records this Republican Congress has rushed to confirm. Trump offered up a long list of judges who would be certain to fulfill the hopes and dreams of most conservatives – those who would be sure to knock down women’s right to choose, gay rights, voting rights – all those nasty liberal ideals. But one can hope it won’t stand and that this will goose Democrats to vote in 2020.

    • Actually, he’s a W appointee, but the conclusion is the same. Oh, and these were the same people who carried on about “judicial activism” when the courts ruled against them.

Comments are closed.